The future is already here, I'm just trying to aggregate it.

The early days of MTV were all about epic narratives and the dazzle of rapid fire cuts, but the more my life and average workday starts to look like something out of Minority Report— constant clicks from browser tab to browser tab; imploring IMs and Gchats and email prompts— I have noticed a shift in what I consider to be a good music video. I still want to escape, but escaping looks different now. Maybe this is why a lot of my favorite videos from the past couple of years— Robyn’s “Call Your Girlfriend”, Grimes’ “Oblivion”, Tyler the Creator’s “Yonkers”, Zebra Katz’ “Ima Read”, Beach House’s “Wishes”, Kanye West’s “Power”, Jessie Ware’s “Wildest Moments”, and of course Beyoncé’s “Single Ladies”— feel either suspended in slow motion or brazenly low-concept. Slow and simple becomes rebellious in a world that’s anything but.

Lindsay Zoladz considers the past, present, and future of the music video in her latest Ordinary Machines column. (via pitchfork)

The new escapism? 

What’s most interesting is how one prediction can come so close to being right, yet be completely misguided on an important detail. For example, in the imaginary 2013, computers compile “the family’s personalized newspaper, featuring articles on the subjects that interest them”… but then they print it out on a laser-jet printer to read it. Or how they predicted that the roads of L.A. would be full of “‘sports-utility’ vehicles” but defined that as a car “that can go from being a two-seat sports car to a beachbuggy—thanks to a plug-in module.” Or how they correctly surmised that banks would starting charging people to talk to tellers, forcing customers to do their banking online… where they video chat with a teller remotely. The whole issue is a fascinating read, even though it contains a lot of Los Angeles-specific, predictions that won’t mean as much to people who aren’t from the Southland. But here are what we found to be some of their better and not-so-better prophecies.

What Did 1988 Los Angeles Think 2013 Los Angeles Would Look Like? - Dashiell Bennett - The Atlantic Wire

danielhonigman:

Big difference. (via NBC) 

These images from the crowds in Italy show similar, but even more dramatic, contrasts in trends as the photos of Obama’s inauguration. 

danielhonigman:

Big difference. (via NBC) 

These images from the crowds in Italy show similar, but even more dramatic, contrasts in trends as the photos of Obama’s inauguration. 

hautepop:

Google Glass is hauntological.
The notion of hauntology (Marx, Derrida) explores the idea of the “past inside the present” - the ghost of the dead father. A nostalgia or mourning for futures and utopias we once believed but that are now lost to time. Also, the haunting of a concept by that which is missed, or that which escapes representation.
With Glass, time is indeed out of joint, and what it is haunted by is the future. The future son who watches that childhood video, or the gathering of friends who witness that skydive, beers in hand congratulating. The anticipation of another viewing - because that is the logic of why record? - and yet a future viewing that will never happen. What Glass is going to produce a hell of a lot of is wobbly home video and not-framed photographs, tending-to-infinite records that no-one will ever view. We weren’t even in the moment properly, as it happened, because Glass foregrounds the spectator in our heads.
That’s what we need bots and algorithms for, to watch the videos we can’t watch ourselves and to tell us what’s important in the moments we weren’t concentrating on when they happened.

Remember what it was like before smartphones? Just think what smartphones have done to photo sharing. Now multiply that by how much easier it will be to blink (or wink or whatever) a photo or video with smart-glasses rather than having to go through all that tedious work of pulling your phone out of your pocket and opening the appropriate app. 
A flood of biblical proportions is coming. 

hautepop:

Google Glass is hauntological.

The notion of hauntology (Marx, Derrida) explores the idea of the “past inside the present” - the ghost of the dead father. A nostalgia or mourning for futures and utopias we once believed but that are now lost to time. Also, the haunting of a concept by that which is missed, or that which escapes representation.

With Glass, time is indeed out of joint, and what it is haunted by is the future. The future son who watches that childhood video, or the gathering of friends who witness that skydive, beers in hand congratulating. The anticipation of another viewing - because that is the logic of why record? - and yet a future viewing that will never happen. What Glass is going to produce a hell of a lot of is wobbly home video and not-framed photographs, tending-to-infinite records that no-one will ever view. We weren’t even in the moment properly, as it happened, because Glass foregrounds the spectator in our heads.

That’s what we need bots and algorithms for, to watch the videos we can’t watch ourselves and to tell us what’s important in the moments we weren’t concentrating on when they happened.

Remember what it was like before smartphones? Just think what smartphones have done to photo sharing. Now multiply that by how much easier it will be to blink (or wink or whatever) a photo or video with smart-glasses rather than having to go through all that tedious work of pulling your phone out of your pocket and opening the appropriate app. 

A flood of biblical proportions is coming. 

Anti-Surveillance Fashion

It’s a little surprising to me how much I’ve been writing about fashion (or anti-fashion?) lately. 

But I really do believe we’re going to see huge uptake around anti-surveillance fashion. Even this article on the inclusion of drones as pop-culture references brings fashion into the conversation. 

The drone’s influence goes beyond symbolism. UK designer Adam Harvey is releasing a line of anti-surveillance jackets and hoodies that claim to interfere with the thermal imaging capabilities on UAVs and CCTV cameras. In line with Rothstein’s position on the drone as a metaphor for technological anxieties, Tim Maly writes that hoodies of all kinds are “an element of fashion driven by an architectural condition … a response to the constant presence of cameras overhead.” Asher Kohn takes that idea even further with his designs for an anti-drone city, reasoning that “Architecture is a way to protect people when law chooses not to.”

Which took me to the Stealth Wear site. I find their mission statement interesting:

Building off previous work with CV Dazzle, camouflage from face detection, Stealth Wear continues to explore the aesthetics of privacy and the potential for fashion to challenge authoritarian surveillance.

Presented by Primitive at Tank Magazine are a suite of new designs, made in collaboration with NYC fashion designer Johanna Bloomfield, that tackle some of the most pressing and sophisticated forms of surveillance today. The ready-to-wear countersurveillance solutions include a series of ‘Anti-Drone’ garments and the Off Pocket, an anti-phone accessory that allows you to instantly zero out your phone’s signal.

Collectively, Stealth Wear is a vision for fashion that addresses the rise of surveillance, the power of those who surveil, and the growing need to exert control over what we are slowly losing, our privacy.

In Privacy We Trust,

 While I don’t think we’re heading towards a dystopian future where we all live in the shadows and I also don’t think that most people will want to actively avoid surveillance technology because they’re doing anything wrong, but if I’ve learned anything about teenagers and college students that’s universally true, it’s that they like feeling like they could do something bad, if they wanted to. And even if they don’t want to, they like the suggestion that they might be doing something bad. 

And no, I don’t think any of these examples will see mainstream adoption but I do think we’ll see watered down (even if they’re ineffectual) versions of this. 

Gasmask Fashion

So I’m seeing a trend, way out on the fringes, but I’m curious to see if it goes anywhere or just stays out on the fringe. And that trend is gasmasks. 

All kinds of safety masks really. I’m noticing this trend in big cities in China because of all the pollution. And not just functional safety masks but Chinese youth are turning them into a fashion statement. 

I’m also seeing this trend with the Steampunk movement (actually across the whole Cyberpunk/Goth/Dystopian spectrum). I think this is partly just the punk-victoriazation of any kinds of technology but I think a big part of it can be attributed to Cherie Priest and her excellent Clockwork Century series, where the city of Seattle is submerged in a poisonous gas.  Good stuff. 

But I also think that “safety masks” are going to see a huge surge in fashion over the next decade. Once smart glasses and ubiquitous facial recognition software enter the mainstream - and possibly in conjunction with increasing global pollution - we’ll see more and more people sporting safety masks as a way of “protecting themselves” from all kinds of perceived and real hazards. The Guy Fawkes mask Anonymous sports is just the beginning. 

Personally I think I’ve found my next project. Maybe for Halloween or maybe not. And that is to turn this cool dual-filter 2pc gasmask into gasmask with a built in microphone and speakers. Not sure how I’ll do that yet but first I have to find a place that sells these. So far I can only find them in bulk. 

Besides all the bad-ass wear respirator masks. Just look at Darth Vader and Bane. 

GenX FTW!!!

We may be small in numbers but we are mighty! 
From RRW:
Forget Gen Y: Gen X is Making Real Change

“A favorite argument among those who talk about the gap between Boomers, Gen X, and Gen Y is that the youngest demographic is more adept with technology. According to the survey results, that’s just not true.

Gen X employees contribute to discussion forums and social networks just as much as their Gen Y counterparts. The use of blogs and wikis was either equal or different by just a couple percentage points.

But the most significant difference was not in usage stats. It was how effective employees are at getting new software to be accepted. 22% of Gen X said they felt they have the “clout in their organization” necessary to introduce new technology, while only 13% of those under 29 said the same.”

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/readwriteweb/~3/HvaB8DFm_eM/forget-gen-y-gen-x-is-making-r.php

I don’t believe cold fusion or hyper local

Call me a skeptic but I’m just not sold on the whole hyper local thing. When I was on the VC side of things I got to look pretty close at a few companies both on the news and the ad side of things. 
The problem for me is scale. It’s just not there. I’m not saying you can’t have hyper local journalism. I just don’t think you can build a business off of it.
From MediaShift: 
Can Allvoices Succeed as Citizen Journalism Platform? “With Examiner.com recently buying outcitizen media site NowPublic for a reported $25 million, the attention turned to similar independent sites such as Allvoices. Would it now become buyout fodder for a mainstream media company, or would it suffer the fate of so many citizen journalism sites that came before it, shutting down before finding a successful business model?”
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/pbs/mediashift-blog/~3/Zstk3-WjhEo/can-allvoices-succeed-as-citizen-journalism-platform253.html